Epic, Apple commerce photographs in opening statements


The Epic Video games v. Apple trial is underway, with each events making their opening statements within the US District Court docket case at the moment.

Epic counsel devoted the early a part of its assertion to characterizing Apple’s technique in constructing the iOS ecosystem as anti-competitive, counting on e-mail conversations from numerous Apple executives indicating a need to set insurance policies across the Apple App Retailer to go off competitors and undermine shopper alternative.

In a single 2010 e-mail, Apple CEO Steve Jobs mentioned a need to “lock clients into our ecosystem,” whereas one other Apple worker in 2016 talked concerning the problem folks had transitioning to Android and forsaking the iMessage app, saying it “quantities to critical lock-in.”

Epic additionally mentioned Apple’s dealing with of the App Retailer was typically arbitrary or inconsistent, selecting and selecting which kinds of purchases it would demand a reduce on (digital items however not bodily items, subscriptions however solely beginning in 2011), and the way a lot the reduce must be. Epic counsel cited testimony from plenty of Apple staff who mentioned Steve Jobs had set the 30% charge, however did not recall any dialogue about why.

“As soon as Apple started to require the implementation of IAP in 2009, it wanted to determine how a lot to cost,” Epic’s counsel said. “Its alternative of 30% was unattached to the price of the instruments, companies, and help it offers builders… There is a title for companies that set costs with out regard to prices: Monopoly.”

A slide from Epic’s opening statements

An Epic professional testified that that Apple’s working margin on the App Retailer was 77.8% in 2019 and 74.9% in 2018, though in its personal opening assertion, Apple mentioned these numbers weren’t bearing in mind the price of the software program groups engaged on SDKs and APIs that must be related to the App Retailer.

Epic additionally attacked Apple’s numerous defenses in its opening assertion. Whereas Apple has cited safety points as one in every of its motivations for its insurance policies, Epic questioned why the Mac App Retailer permits for a comparatively higher quantity of freedom than iOS, and famous the corporate’s repeated insistence that the Mac App Retailer is itself a safe and “worry-free” platform for apps.

“Take away the safety specific to the iPhone, and the unhealthy actors are going to have a area day, which is why Android safety statistics are a lot worse”

Apple counsel

Apple’s counsel defined the corporate’s cause for the discrepancy in platform safety in its opening assertion, saying, “There are over 1 billion moveable iOS units, with 1.Eight million apps for obtain. Every machine has a digital camera, and a microphone, and a GPS that are at all times current. This risk mannequin is what makes iOS completely different from MacOS.

“The iPhone isn’t a Mac. It’s a uncommon second when someone leaves a Mac on a bus, or in a movie show. Your Mac would not at all times know the place you might be, or the place your kids are. Extra units to assault, extra alternatives to assault, extra incentives to assault. Take away the safety specific to the iPhone, and the unhealthy actors are going to have a area day, which is why Android safety statistics are a lot worse.”

Epic counsel argued that the App Retailer has such a lock on iOS buyer’s habits after the preliminary buy that it qualifies as a single-brand product market, including it’s “much more entrenched in each factual approach that issues” than the Eastman Kodak firm, which misplaced a 1992 Supreme Court docket determination over its refusal to promote service and upkeep components to firms that purchased its photocopiers second-hand.

“Your honor, Epic desires to succeed in clients misplaced inside Apple’s walled backyard,” the corporate’s counsel concluded. “Within the absence of Apple’s restrictions, Epic and all builders won’t solely be capable of attain these clients straight, however Epic will be capable of present them with extra innovation, decrease costs, and higher customer support. We submit that when the proof is in, it would present unambiguously that Apple is a monopoly, has unlawfully campaigned as a monopoly, and that Epic has met its burden on all claims.”

In its personal opening assertion, Apple centered on just a few factors repeatedly, arguing that the success of the App Retailer has really improved shopper alternative, noting it presents greater than 1.Eight million apps at the moment, whereas builders made greater than $three billion collectively from these apps within the third quarter of 2019.

“Epic desires to succeed in clients misplaced inside Apple’s walled backyard”

Epic counsel

Epic itself has been the beneficiary of the App Retailer, Apple counsel argued, saying that the corporate’s hit Fortnite has made greater than $750 million on iOS alone.

It additionally careworn that it has by no means risen costs on builders, and has even lowered its income share on subscriptions (after the primary 12 months), movies, and small companies. (Epic argued that the corporate’s determination to begin taking a share of subscriptions within the first place counted as a value hike.)

One other level of focus for Apple was on Epic’s try to painting the App Retailer as a single-brand market.

“Each one in every of Epic’s claims relies on its potential to outline a related market, the universe of affordable substitutes,” Apple counsel mentioned.

Apple’s personal professional economist, former director of the FTC’s Bureau of Economics Francine LaFontaine, PhD, was quoted as saying the proposed single-brand aftermarket of all apps on the App Retailer was too broad to high quality in some methods, and too slim in others.

It is too broad to be a single market if shoppers of 1 app are unlikely to substitute with one another — the Fortnite app wasn’t essentially competing with the Starbucks app, as an illustration — however too slim if it excludes substitutions which might be more likely to occur.

To bolster the “too slim” level, Apple counsel famous that 4 folks on iPhone, Xbox, Swap, and PC might play the identical sport of Want for Velocity towards each other, however Epic’s market definition would imply three of these folks wouldn’t rely as a part of the related market.

Apple says it accounts for a relatively small amount of Fortnite's success

Apple says it accounts for a comparatively small quantity of Fortnite’s success

Past that, Apple cited its personal professional economist who decided that eradicating Fortnite from the App Retailer and Google Play triggered the sport to see new person accounts added on each different platform, suggesting the assorted platforms are competing with each other in the identical market.

Apple’s counsel additionally warned that an Epic victory would imply “different ecosystems would fall too,” saying there can be nothing to differentiate the App Retailer from console producers like Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony, given all of them cost the identical reduce and prohibit sideloading of packages or rival shops on their {hardware}.

“Probably the most harmful factor Epic goes to promote the courtroom is the concept shoppers can be higher off if Epic had its approach,” Apple’s counsel concluded. “Nothing could possibly be farther from the reality. Epic speculates a couple of world the place Apple is a unique firm. And it is asking this courtroom to make an enormous wager that that world is a greater world than the one we stay in. It is not.

“The outcome for shoppers and builders will likely be much less safety, much less privateness, much less reliability, decrease high quality, and fewer alternative. Will probably be the very factor that the antitrust legal guidelines search to guard [against].”

function runGoogleAnalytics(anonymous) {

if (window.gaDone) return;

(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m)function(),i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),

var args = {
“trackingId”: “UA-5699723-1”,
“cookieDomain”: “.gamesindustry.biz”

if(anonymous) {
args[“storage”] = “none”;

ga(‘create’, args);
ga(‘require’, ‘displayfeatures’);
ga(‘require’, ‘linkid’, ‘linkid.js’);

if(anonymous) {
ga(‘set’, ‘anonymizeIp’, true);

ga(‘set’, ‘dimension5’, ‘europe’);
ga(‘set’, ‘dimension6’, ‘none’);

ga(‘set’, ‘dimension1’, ‘news’); ga(‘set’, ‘dimension2’, ‘mobile, legal, publishing’); ga(‘set’, ‘dimension3’, ‘Brendan Sinclair’); ga(‘set’, ‘dimension4’, ‘no’);
ga(‘set’, ‘dimension12’, ‘no’);

ga(‘send’, ‘pageview’);

if ( window.location.href.substr(-11) == “#justposted” ) {
ga(‘send’, ‘event’, ‘Comments’, ‘Posted’, ‘2021-05-03-epic-apple-trade-shots-in-opening-statements’, {
‘dimension1’: ‘news’,
‘dimension2’: ‘mobile, legal, publishing’,
‘dimension3’: ‘Brendan Sinclair’

window.gaDone = true;


function runComscore() {
var _comscore = _comscore || [];
_comscore.push({ c1: “2”, c2: “8518622” });
(function() {
var s = document.createElement(“script”);
el = document.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
s.async = true;
s.src = “https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js”;
el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el);
function runFacebookPixel() {


fbq(‘init’, ‘1863210500478936’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);


function runLinkedinInsights() {

_linkedin_partner_id = “2840722”;
window._linkedin_data_partner_ids = window._linkedin_data_partner_ids || [];

(function() {
var s = document.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
var b = document.createElement(“script”);
b.type = “text/javascript”;b.async = true;
b.src = “https://snap.licdn.com/li.lms-analytics/insight.min.js”;
s.parentNode.insertBefore(b, s);


function runTwitterPixel() {




function triggerMormont() {
mormont(‘set’, ‘section’, ‘article’);
mormont(‘set’, ‘language’, ‘en’);
mormont(‘set’, ‘published’, “2021-05-03T22:11:00+01:00”);
mormont(‘set’, ‘article_type’, “news”);
mormont(‘set’, ‘author’, “Brendan Sinclair”);
mormont(‘set’, ‘tags’, [‘tag:mobile’,’tag:legal’,’tag:publishing’])
mormont(‘set’, ‘is_logged_in’, “1”);
mormont(‘send’, ‘pageview’);

function runMormont() {
var s = document.createElement(‘script’);
s.async = true;
s.onload = function() { triggerMormont() };

const frames = window.frames;
for (let i = 0; i < frames.length; i++) {

function sandboxIframes() {
const iframes = jQuery('iframe[src]:not([data-src])');
jQuery.each(iframes, function() {
const iframe = jQuery(this);
const src = iframe.attr('src');
// Youtube iframes are exempt from being sandboxed
// as long as we swap them for the Privacy Enhanced player
if (src.match(/^(https?:)?//(www.)?youtube.com/embed//i)) {
iframe.attr('data-src', src);
iframe.attr('src', src.replace('youtube.com', 'youtube-nocookie.com'));
} else {
iframe.attr('title', 'Please accept cookies to see this iframe.');
iframe.attr('data-src', src);

function sandboxScripts() {
const scripts = jQuery('script[src]:not(.ignore-script)');
jQuery.each(scripts, function() {
const script = jQuery(this);
script.attr('type', 'text/plain');
script.attr('data-src', script.attr('src'));

function runIframes() {
const iframes = jQuery('iframe[data-src]');
jQuery.each(iframes, function() {
const iframe = jQuery(this);
iframe.attr('src', iframe.attr('data-src'));

function runScripts() {
const scripts = jQuery('script[data-src]:not(.ignore-script)');
jQuery.each(scripts, function() {
const script = jQuery(this);
script.attr('src', script.attr('data-src'));
script.attr('type', 'text/javascript');


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here